A single sentence from a federal judge in Washington closed a chapter that had lasted sixteen years.
On August 5, 2026, Judge Ana C. Reyes of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order confirming that her earlier injunction blocking the termination of Haiti’s Temporary Protected Status was void. The Supreme Court had already taken the question out of the courts’ hands.
What Happened
In February 2026, the district court stayed the Department of Homeland Security’s termination of Haiti’s TPS designation, keeping protections in place while litigation continued.
That changed on June 25, 2026, when the Supreme Court decided Mullin v. Doe. In a 6-3 ruling, the Court held that federal courts lack the authority to review the Homeland Security Secretary’s decision to terminate a country’s TPS designation.
The August 5 order did little more than acknowledge what that decision required. As The Washington Post reported, the termination took effect and left thousands of Haitian workers out of work and in limbo.
More Read
The Numbers
Roughly 350,000 Haitians held TPS. Beyond Haiti, approximately 1.3 million TPS holders from 17 countries now sit in the same legal position: their status rests entirely on the Secretary’s discretion, with no meaningful route to judicial review.
Many are long settled here. Haiti’s designation traces back to the 2010 earthquake, meaning a large share of beneficiaries have lived and worked in the United States for more than a decade. Reporting has described significant concentrations in health care, caregiving and agriculture.
What This Means for TPS Holders
When TPS ends, the work authorization tied to it ends with it, and so does the protection from removal.
More Read
If you held Haitian TPS, an Employment Authorization Document issued on that basis is no longer valid. Employers running reverification will see the expiration. Continuing to work without another basis for authorization creates legal exposure for the worker and the employer alike.
The critical question now is whether some other form of status or relief applies. Common alternatives include a pending or approvable family-based petition, asylum where filing deadlines and exceptions permit, adjustment of status through a U.S. citizen spouse or adult child, eligibility for a U or T visa, and withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture.
None of these are automatic and several are genuinely difficult to win. But they are questions to bring to a lawyer now rather than after an arrest.
Anyone affected should consult a licensed immigration attorney or a Board of Immigration Appeals accredited representative as soon as possible, and should avoid notarios and unlicensed consultants, whose mistakes can permanently damage a case. This article is for general information only and is not legal advice.
Follow @DailyImmigrant for accurate, timely immigration news and updates every day.
