Six weeks after the Supreme Court turned back his effort to end birthright citizenship, President Trump signed two new executive orders aimed at the same target from a different angle. Civil rights groups went back to court within five days.
What happened
On August 6, 2026, the president signed two executive orders restricting birthright citizenship and what the orders describe as “birth tourism,” according to reporting by NPR.
The orders are narrower than the January 2025 order the Supreme Court rejected. They would deny citizenship to U.S.-born children of foreign government employees serving in the United States, address cases involving citizenship fraud, and cover children of people the administration classifies as “alien enemies.” They also direct federal agencies to deny visas to applicants suspected of traveling to the United States to give birth.
The legal challenge
On August 11, 2026, the ACLU and other immigrant rights organizations filed in federal court seeking to block the orders, as reported by Reuters and UPI.
Notably, they did not file a new lawsuit. Instead they returned to the judge who ruled in their favor in the earlier class action, asking the court to hold that the administration cannot deny citizenship to anyone covered by that existing class. In their filing, the groups characterized the new orders as an improper attempt to work around the Supreme Court’s June 30 rejection of the earlier effort, which had sought to end birthright citizenship for children whose parents are neither U.S. citizens nor lawful permanent residents.
More Read
Who is affected
For the overwhelming majority of children born in the United States, nothing has changed. The Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship clause remains in force, the Supreme Court declined to narrow it in June, and the new orders are drawn to reach specific and comparatively small categories.
The people with real exposure are narrower: families where a parent is employed by a foreign government in the United States, families where the government alleges fraud in obtaining status or citizenship, people the administration designates under “alien enemies” authority, and visa applicants who are pregnant or who an officer suspects intend to give birth in the United States.
That last category is the one most likely to affect ordinary travelers. Visa officers have broad discretion, and a directive to screen for suspected birth tourism can be applied unevenly.
More Read
What this means for you
If your child was born in the United States and you are not in one of the categories above, your child’s citizenship is not in question, and you do not need to take any action.
If you are pregnant and hold or are applying for a B-1/B-2 visitor visa, expect more questioning about the purpose and timing of your trip. Being pregnant is not itself a bar to entry, but travel plans that appear built around a U.S. birth invite scrutiny.
If you are a foreign government employee posted in the United States, or if any part of your immigration history involves an allegation of fraud, talk to an immigration attorney about how these orders could apply to your family.
Watch the docket rather than the headlines. Executive orders can be signed, enjoined, narrowed, and revived within weeks, and what matters for your case is what a court permits to take effect.
This article is for general information only and is not legal advice.
Follow @DailyImmigrant for accurate, timely immigration news and updates every day.
