The Justice Department has sued three more states over laws that let undocumented students pay in-state tuition at public colleges, escalating a campaign that has already pushed several states to abandon the practice.
What Happened
On August 10, 2026, the Department of Justice filed suit against New York, Connecticut, and Vermont, according to reporting by Bloomberg Law, Inside Higher Ed, and NOTUS. Department officials said they intend to keep pressing the issue nationwide.
The Legal Argument
The government argues that the state programs unconstitutionally discriminate against students who are U.S. citizens, and that the states violated the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause along with two 2025 executive orders by extending tuition reductions and financial aid to undocumented residents.
The state laws are written as residency rules. In all three states, the reduced in-state rate is available to any student who satisfies state residency criteria, without regard to immigration status. That framing is the core of the dispute. The states say they treat residents equally; the Justice Department says the practical result is that a citizen from another state pays more than an undocumented resident of that state.
Part of a Broader Campaign
This is not an isolated filing. According to NOTUS and Inside Higher Ed, Texas, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Nebraska, and Illinois have already halted their tuition policies after similar challenges, and seventeen states have faced litigation over laws granting undocumented immigrants access to state financial assistance. Separate suits have targeted Virginia and Oklahoma.
More Read
In several earlier cases the states did not mount a full defense. The policies ended through consent judgments entered within weeks of filing rather than after a trial.
Who Is Affected
The suits reach undocumented students currently enrolled at public colleges and universities in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont, incoming students who built their budgets around in-state rates, and in many cases DACA recipients, whose eligibility often rests on the same residency statutes now under challenge.
The financial stakes are substantial. At public universities, the out-of-state rate is typically a multiple of the in-state rate, a gap large enough to end an education rather than merely complicate it.
More Read
What This Means for You
Nothing has changed yet. A lawsuit is not a ruling. The laws in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont remain in effect while the cases proceed, and students receiving in-state rates should continue to receive them unless a court orders otherwise or the state changes its policy.
Still, a few steps are worth taking now. Confirm your residency classification in writing with your registrar or bursar and save the documentation, because a written record of your current status matters if the policy shifts later.
Watch for notices from your institution and your state’s higher education agency. In the states that reversed course, the change often arrived through a court-approved settlement rather than a trial verdict, which means it can arrive quickly.
Run your budget at the out-of-state rate so a mid-year change does not catch you unprepared, and identify private scholarships that do not require citizenship or lawful immigration status.
If you are a DACA recipient, ask your school specifically whether its residency policy relies on the challenged statute or on a separate provision. The answer varies by state.
Before withdrawing, transferring, or taking a leave, talk to an immigration attorney or a campus legal clinic.
More Read
This article is for general information only and is not legal advice.
What to Watch
All three states have signaled they will defend their laws, which would make these cases different from several of the earlier ones. The rulings to watch are the early ones on preliminary relief, since those often determine whether a tuition policy survives the coming academic year.
Follow @DailyImmigrant for accurate, timely immigration news and updates every day.
