ICE Launches Policy to Deny Bond Hearings for Millions of Undocumented Immigrants

Daily Immigrant

An internal memo issued by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on July 15 authorized agents to deny bond hearings for immigrants who entered the U.S. illegally. The directive dramatically limits the ability of detained individuals to seek release, even while their deportation cases unfold.

This move builds upon the July 8 policy that stripped bond access from many undocumented detainees—potentially leading to indefinite detention without judicial review. Critics argue this shift undermines separation-of-powers and sets the stage for legal challenges.


🔑 What’s Changing?

  • ICE is officially denying bond hearings to undocumented detainees, reducing judicial oversight.
  • The policy aligns with earlier ICE actions from July 8, which broadly eliminated bond eligibility.
  • Advocates warn this may dramatically expand detention numbers, leveraging new congressional funding that boosts capacity to 100,000 from 58,000 detainees.

🧾 What Are the Options Now?

- Advertisement -
  • Detained Immigrants: Bond hearings may no longer be an option—focus should shift to alternative release efforts like humanitarian parole or credible fear requests.
  • Attorneys and Advocates: Immediate legal intervention is key; consider class-action lawsuits or injunctions to protect due process.
  • Community & Family Members: Mobilize support networks and public pressure to counter expanded ICE authority.

⚠️ Important Reminders

  • Bond hearings have historically allowed noncitizens to return to families while preparing cases—this change eliminates a vital check on indefinite detention.
  • Indefinite detention risks may worsen access to representation and fairness in adjudications.
  • Legal challenges are underway—watch for injunctions or rule reversals.

📲 Learn More

  • ICE’s expansion of detention via bond denial: Reuters coverage
  • Early July policy overview: ICE bond ineligibility memo explained
  • ACLU response: lawsuit filing highlights constitutional concerns
Share This Article